Machiavelli gives much
insight to the rulers of Florence on how to rule as a prince, yet he also tells
them how not to rule. Have you ever
seen TLC’s show What Not To Wear?
It’s kinda like that. They give an individual a complete makeover, helping her
pick out clothes that are best suited for her body type yet they focus more so
on what she should not be wearing (nope, those polka dotted boots DO NOT match
your leopard print pants). Why do they do this? It’s a heck of a lot more
interesting and the makover-ee gains a lot more. I think that was Machiavelli’s
approach when writing The Prince, this
guide for ruling dedicated to Lorenzo de’ Medici. In chapter 15, he starts off by saying
that he “knows many have written on this subject” yet he is going to write about
it in a different way with a different approach-or give this topic a “makeover”.
Much
that Machiavelli talks about in these excerpts is how a Prince needs to learn
concepts that are tricky. Some examples below are that a prince must learn:
1)
to be other than good, and “to use or not to use his goodness as necessity
requires” (page 1)
2)
to handle the disapproval of not possessing all positive qualities-for
Machiavelli states that it is impossible and “against the conditions of human
nature” for someone to be perfect (although the bar is set that high for
princes) (page 2)
3)
to balance being merciful-show mercy yet still maintain enough power to keep
your kingdom in order
4)
to inspire fear-and kill when there is a just reason, yet refrain from taking
another’s property.
All
these things are about balance; learn how to be good-but also cruel, show
mercy-but not too much, exert power-yet just enough to maintain control, be
loved-yet more so feared. A balance is what will make a successful ruler. He draws
this strong connection between subjects and rulers; the way a prince is
perceived is based on the manner in which he maintains control. It is
interesting how being feared it not completely negative; rather it is hatred
that a prince “must do his best to escape”.
So
where does that leave the show What Not To Wear? Am I really stretching it
by connecting this political philosophy to a modern day TV show? Well, if you
have actually seen the show you would know that Stacy and Clinton (the hosts)
help people discover a new sense of personal style rooted in what they love. In
one episode a women absolutely loved the color purple, and would only wear
purple shirts and pants. Stacy and Clinton showed her that there is an in
between- she can still wear purple yet in moderation. It was about balance. They interact with people who
hate the way they look and feel and help inspire the best within them, showing
them how dressing better transmits into feeling better. Both Stacy and Clinton
and Machiavelli condemn hatred, whether it be towards yourself or regarding a
prince in Florence. So maybe us non-princes can also learn a little something
from Machiavelli’s The Prince?
It seems like a bit of a stretch to relate Machiavelli's The Prince to this show as the show truly is about clothing; the balance associated with the clothing and the hosts are not equivalent to the balance that Machiavelli discusses: the balance of being feared and being loved.
ReplyDeletePerhaps it would be more apt to relate the premise of the show to the concepts discussed by Mills, specifically, experiments in living. While participants on the show do not sign up for the show own their own accord, it is their choice to participate and cooperate on the show. By choosing to appear on the show, they are agreeing to be judged and worked on in front of potentially millions of viewers. It is certainly something considered to be an experiment in living, something abnormal and exceptionally rare. Furthermore, it is an experience that is directed to affecting some change in the participant: their fashion and fashion sense.
The concept of experiments in living should also help to improve the lives of other people in society, thus through experiments in living, society improves with a greater collection of knowledge. It could be argued that the show, while for the entertainment of viewers, also improves their lives by expanding their fashion knowledge and the collective fashion knowledge of society.